Join Telegram Study Group ▷
Value is considered to be in relative to the perception of the employer, and in the case of Cisco certifications generally relative to the position you’re looking for.
If IP networking is the sole focus of the job you’re after, then CCNP might help get passed initial screening of resume’s, giving you a better chance of an interview, but it won’t get you the job. Employers aren’t going to blindly give you a key role in controlling network infrastructure decisions or even operations based on certification status. Thus, you might be also attracted to gain this certification and if you are, you should know that it is not at all easy to acquire the CCNP. You should gain and good and reliable study dumps provider, like that I gained through the SPOTO Club.
Another use of CCNP is that it tells people familiar with the curriculum how they can talk to you. This might sound like a small thing, but it is useful to know that I can speak of BGP community strings, OSPF LSA types, VRRP states, etc., and expect you to know what I’m talking about immediately. In contrast, if I only know that how many years of experience in IP networking, you would be having, wouldn’t tell me very much at all - you could have been supporting a small IS-IS network with equipment from some other vendor, and you might have no knowledge of any of the technologies which are going to be relevant in a major enterprise, whereas CCNP R&S is considered to be a well-known, standard knowledge base that would guarantee, or at least, expected, of anyone holding that designation.
Also, concerning people criticizing the certification by saying that many incompetent network administrators hold it, I have a few thoughts:
· Often people who give this criticism don’t understand what the certification covers. CCNP doesn’t claim to cover how to be a good network planner, nor does it would be claiming to teach you about how to physically work with any Cisco equipment. Judge the certification for how well it is going to lines up with what it claims to be, not by what you wish it to be.
· The credential gives you a ground to being asking IP networking-related questions of a job candidate. It is considered to be very much valuable insofar as it would be triggering that evaluation, as it’s a claim of the candidate of having that knowledge.
· I don’t believe that any certification with a standard curriculum could assess the candidate’s full ability as a network designer. Network design is believed to be a practice rather than a science, and it would be requiring a level of pragmatism, vision, and breadth of IT-SM knowledge that isn’t just going to be testable in a structured exam nor is it easily acquired without having the proper experience. In this way, to ask these things of any exam isn’t reasonable.
To further that comparison in terms of value for CCNP, consider that it would be forcing a common theoretical knowledge base across the industry, whether you would be working with particular protocols or not in your job. In contrast, theory-based knowledge in telecommunications is gained very much on an as-needed basis by people who would be relative to the particular job that they are doing at the time.
Hence, you should now know the value of the CCNP Certification and if you wish to pursue it, I would recommend you to join the SPOTO Club. When it comes to IT certification, I have heard a lot about the SPOTO Club and even experienced it personally. SPOTO Club is the best place for the aspiring candidates of CCNP.
More you may be interested:
1. Is CCNA Suitable for Females to Take?
2. How to Study CCNA Security Certification Exam?
3. How Much Does it Cost to be A CCNA Certified?
