During VLAN planning for a campus network, VLAN IDs for different service types must be allocated consecutively, without redundancy, to prevent omissions in future allocations. This statement is false. In campus network VLAN planning, VLAN IDs do not have to be allocated strictly consecutively without any gaps. In fact, leaving some reserved VLAN IDs is often a practical and recommended design approach. VLAN planning should focus on clarity, scalability, maintainability, and service separation, rather than on forcing all VLAN IDs to be contiguous. For example, an administrator may reserve certain VLAN ranges for user access, voice services, management, wireless services, guest access, future expansion, or specific departments. Such structured planning makes later network expansion easier and reduces the risk of service conflicts or disruptive renumbering. HCIA-Datacom emphasizes that good campus network planning should consider current requirements and future growth. Consecutive allocation may look tidy at first, but it can actually reduce flexibility and make later additions more difficult. Therefore, the idea that VLAN IDs must be assigned consecutively without redundancy to avoid omissions is not a correct design principle. Reasonable reservation and categorized allocation are often more beneficial in real enterprise campus networks.
Join Telegram Study Group ▷