1. + - ------------------------------------------------------------- + 2. | SYSTEM$CLUSTERING_INFORMATION('SF_DATA', '(COL1, COL3)') | 3. | - ------------------------------------------------------------- | 4. | { | 5. | "cluster_by_keys" : "(COL1, COL3)", | 6. | "total_partition_count" : 1156, | 7. | "total_constant_partition_count" : 0, | 8. | "average_overlaps" : 117.5484, | 9. | "average_depth" : 64.0701, | 10. | "partition_depth_histogram" : { | 11. | "00000" : 0, | 12. | "00001" : 0, | 13. | "00002" : 3, | 14. | "00003" : 3, | 15. | "00004" : 4, | 16. | "00005" : 6, | 17. | "00006" : 3, | 18. | "00007" : 5, | 19. | "00008" : 10, | 20. | "00009" : 5, | 21. | "00010" : 7, | 22. | "00011" : 6, | 23. | "00012" : 8, | 24. | "00013" : 8, | 25. | "00014" : 9, | 26. | "00015" : 8, | 27. | "00016" : 6, | 28. | "00032" : 98, | 29. | "00064" : 269, | 30. | "00128" : 698 | 31. | } | 32. | } | 33. + - ------------------------------------------------------------- + The Above example indicates that the SF_DATA table is not well - clustered for which of following valid reasons?
A. Zero (0) constant micro - partitions out of 1156 total micro - partitions
B. High average of overlapping micro - partitions
C. High average of overlap depth across micro - partitions
D. Most of the micro - partitions are grouped at the lower - end of the histogram, with the majority of micro - partitions having an overlap depth between 64 and 128
E. ALL of the above