參考答案
Scrum and Kanban are both Agile frameworks, but they have different characteristics that make them suitable for different contexts. Scrum is time-boxed with fixed-length sprints (typically 2-4 weeks), prescriptive ceremonies (planning, standups, review, retrospective), defined roles (Product Owner, Scrum Master, Development Team), and commitment-based planning where the team commits to a sprint goal and specific work. Kanban is flow-based with continuous delivery rather than iterations, minimal prescribed practices (primarily visualization and WIP limits), no specific roles required, and pull-based system where work is pulled from the backlog as capacity becomes available. I choose Scrum when we have a stable team working on a defined product backlog, benefit from regular planning and review cycles, have stakeholders who want predictable delivery cadence, and are building new features where iterative development adds value. I choose Kanban when work is more operational (bug fixes, support requests, ad hoc tasks), priorities change frequently and time-boxing doesn't make sense, the team is distributed or frequently interrupted, and we want to optimize cycle time and throughput. In my last role, I used Scrum for our product development team building new features and Kanban for our support team handling customer issues. Both frameworks worked well in their respective contexts. I've also implemented Scrumban, a hybrid approach, for teams transitioning between contexts or needing elements of both.